Green Climate: Protecting Our Forests & Wilderness
Green Climate is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization committed to
the protection and defense of our forests and wilderness.
Green Climate is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization committed to
the protection and defense of our forests and wilderness.
John Muir
The Department of Agriculture and the National Forest Service formally proposed the repeal of the Roadless Rule on October 18, 2026. The Roadless Rule was promulgated in 2001 and created a special level of protection for 45 million acres of national forest land by designating them as Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRA). The repeal of the Roadless Rule will do more than just strike a section of the Code of Federal Regulations, it will eliminate the IRA designation for these 45 million acres. Without the IRA designation roads can be built through these areas with little environmental review. The Repeal is being characterized as having little or no impact until new roads are proposed, permitted, and built. That is simply untrue, because without the IRA designations there is no land management plan category that strictly prohibits new roads. This action ignores the millions of miles of existing roads through national forests that are not being maintained. NFS has very little money budgeted for maintenance of these roads. Yet, the Administration is taking this drastic action.
One size does not fill all. Over 95% of the IRAs are in the Western Region where they are stretched across huge areas of lands. In the Eastern Region, the acreage of IRAs is much smaller (1.5-2.5 million acres versus 45 million acres in the west). Existing roads are much closer, and in some cases, already cross IRAs. Very few new roads are justified because of the cost is likely $1mm per mile. The extensive network of roads through eastern national forest land mitigates the Proposed Rule’s expressed justification that it will improve wildfire response and prevention. In Eastern Region IRAs, the terrain varies greatly as do the potential impacts which include impairment of water quality for animals and drinking water, extreme biodiversity, and fragility of the forests to erosion and other unique challenges. The IRAs also drive significant revenue, especially, in the George Washington National Forest and the Jefferson National Forests (see attached). All of these unique factors must be included in the EIS and OMB’s analysis of the Proposed Rule.
The Virginia Wilderness Committee is the lead on the opposition of the RRR here in the Commonwealth. Here is VWC's press release and a radio interview.
https://www.vawilderness.org/news/press-release-on-roadless-repeal
https://www.wmra.org/2026-08-21/usda-solicits-public-comments-on-proposed-roadless-rule-rescission
VWC captures the wildfire issue and impacts on George Washington National Forest and Shenandoah National Forest.
8/19/2026
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 19, 2026
FROM: Virginia Wilderness Committee
Rollback of federal rule threatens Virginia waters, wildlife, nature, and recreation
CONTACT:
Ellen Stuart-Haentjens, Executive Director
estuarthaentjens@vawilderness.org, 804-814-8927
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced yesterday that, despite strong public opposition, the U.S. Forest Service plans to rescind the long-standing Roadless Rule, which has protected more than 45 million acres of undeveloped national forest lands for 25 years.
The agency characterized the rollback as a wildfire-prevention measure, even though the Roadless Rule already allows fuel reduction, small tree thinning, and other wildfire-prevention management work. In Appalachia, more than 80 percent of wildfires are human caused; nationwide, 90 percent of wildfire ignitions occur within half a mile of roads. From 1992 to 2024, wildfires were four times as likely to start in roaded areas than in roadless forest tracts. Given that evidence, the claim that building more roads in forests would reduce wildfire risk is misleading–so much so that wildland firefighters across the country have opposed repealing the Roadless Rule.
In Virginia, the repeal would affect 84 percent of the roughly 394,000 acres on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests currently protected by the Roadless Rule– the largest share of any Eastern state.
Since 2001, roadless areas in Virginia and across the country have been recognized as some of the last wild national forest lands not already protected as congressionally designated Wilderness. By remaining closed to roadbuilding, mining, commercial logging and other development allowed elsewhere in national forests, these areas help protect drinking water, provide essential habitat for wildlife and native plants, and support sustainable economic benefits for rural communities.
Statement from the Virginia Wilderness Committee’s Executive Director Ellen Stuart-Haentjens:
“These landscapes quietly perform some of the most important environmental services Virginians rely on every day – most importantly, they provide clean drinking water. The clear mountain streams that rise in our roadless areas flow into the James, Potomac, and Shenandoah rivers that help sustain communities and our natural heritage all the way to the Chesapeake Bay.”
“If we cut roads into these areas and allow for mining, commercial logging and other development, we trade long-term clean water security for short-term extraction. Not a good deal for Virginians.”
“Generations of hunters, hikers, anglers, birders and other outdoor enthusiasts have treasured roadless areas for their beauty, healthy forests, and ample wildlife. These places are on public land and belong to all of us; we cannot allow them to be offered up to the highest bidder who would squander our children’s future enjoyment of some of nature’s finest wild places.”
Fast Facts
The Roadless Area Conservation Rule passed in 2001, following years of scientific study, policy debate, and public review that included 1.6 million public comments, the most ever at the time, with the vast majority in favor of the rule.
National forest Roadless Areas in Virginia:
Nationally:
#
Organized in 1969, the Virginia Wilderness Committee (VWC) works to permanently protect the best of Virginia's wild places for future generations, foster understanding and appreciation of Wilderness, and promote enjoyment and stewardship of our last remaining wildlands. The Virginia Wilderness Committee is a 501(C)3 non-profit citizens' group.
At this point, the deadline for comments is September 21, 2026. Petitions are being filed to extend the comment deadline which is justified given the importance and complexity of the rule. The draft Environmental Impact Statement is almost 900. We are preparing a draft of comments from the group and an outline for the members.

To effectively tackle the climate change crisis, it is essential for charitable organizations to advocate for the protection, improvement, and expansion of the earth's natural resources. Old growth forests, wetlands, and oceans play a crucial role in capturing and storing CO2 and other greenhouse gases. This ongoing process of carbon capture and sequestration is vital for environmental protection and sustainability, unlike other strategies that may have limitations. Furthermore, promoting forest conservation and responsible timber harvesting can enhance these efforts.

It is vital that we enjoy our natural resources and value the magic they hold. As a charitable organization focused on environmental protection and sustainability, we recognize the priceless experience of our forests, wilderness, wetlands, rivers, oceans, parks, and natural monuments. Protecting these areas is crucial in the fight against climate change, as they play a significant role in reducing greenhouse gases and promoting forest conservation through responsible timber harvesting practices.

Green Climate, a dedicated charitable organization, actively participating in the conservation and protection of our natural resources. This commitment not only enhances our enjoyment of these gifts but also represents a viable solution to climate change. Through initiatives focused on environmental protection, forest conservation, and sustainable practices, we aim to reduce greenhouse gases while ensuring responsible timber harvesting.
On March 1, 2025, the White House issued Executive Order 14225 entitled, “Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production.” The order emphasized that increased timber harvesting on National Forest Lands is “critical to the nation’s well-being” and “essential for crucial human activities like construction and energy production.” Based on these claims, the order seeks to open hundreds of millions of acres of federal forest land to timber harvesting while circumventing “heavy-handed Federal policies.” The policies referenced in the order include essential permitting requirements like those under the Endangered Species Act, which are vital for environmental protection and forest conservation. The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior were directed to provide guidance on tools to enhance timber production, promote sound forest management, and reduce delivery times while maintaining sustainability and considering the impact on natural resources.
In furtherance of this order, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins issued an April 3, 2025 memorandum, Secretary’s Memorandum 1078-006, “Increasing Timber Production And Designating An Emergency Situation On National Forest System Lands.” This memorandum significantly exceeds the authority granted by the White House Executive Order and mandates that the National Forest Service clear timber deemed necessary to mitigate forest fire risk and address increased tree mortality. In this action, Secretary Rollins makes an Emergency Situation Determination (ESD) under the Biden Administration's Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act.
The ESD provision typically allows for expedited action post-storms and wildfires. However, the Secretary’s ESD determination is perceived as an illegal attempt to bypass administrative permitting requirements and the Endangered Species Act. The Secretary uses the ESD to rationalize timber harvesting across 112,646,000 acres of our forests, claiming it is critical for managing climate change impacts and reducing greenhouse gases. Nonetheless, increased timber harvesting does not constitute an emergency action, as evidenced by an order to the National Forest Service enforcing the directive that timber may be sold at the low price set by the ESD.
Green Climate, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization dedicated to environmental protection, strongly opposes this illegal action and is actively evaluating all options to challenge it.
On June 4, 2025, Green Climate sued Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins. The Complaint asks the Court to declare the Timber Harvesting memo illegal and stay its further application.
Forests and wilderness play a crucial role in addressing climate change and are essential for environmental protection. As a charitable organization focused on sustainability, we recognize that forest conservation is vital for reducing greenhouse gases and preserving our natural resources. Responsible timber harvesting practices can further enhance these efforts, ensuring that our forests continue to thrive for future generations.
The ongoing impacts of climate change have prompted various efforts by charitable organizations focused on environmental protection and forest conservation. These initiatives aim to reduce greenhouse gases and promote sustainability while safeguarding our natural resources. Additionally, responsible timber harvesting practices are essential for maintaining ecological balance.
Farming can play a significant role in addressing climate change and promoting sustainability. As a charitable organization focused on environmental protection, we recognize that responsible farming practices can help reduce greenhouse gases and conserve natural resources. Additionally, initiatives like forest conservation and sustainable timber harvesting are essential in creating a balanced ecosystem that benefits both agriculture and the environment.
Explore perspectives from various charitable organizations focused on environmental protection and climate change. Notable examples include the Virginia Wilderness Committee, The Wilderness Society and The Nature Conservancy, both of which emphasize sustainability and forest conservation while addressing issues like greenhouse gases and the responsible management of natural resources, including timber harvesting.